Section links: (5 Articles) Reception and history Some Chromium features do not work on ungoogled-chromium, a notable one being installing extensions directly from the Chrome Web Store. The browser also adds smaller non-essential features such as flags protecting against fingerprinting and borrows features from other projects such as Debian. Removing binaries from the Chromium source code and replacing them with custom alternatives.Replacing Google web domains in the Chromium source code with non-existent web domains and blocking internal requests to those domains.Disabling functionality that requires Google domains, including Google Safe Browsing.Operating system: Windows, Linux, Android, macOS, BSDs Written in: C++ primarily HTML, CSS, JavaScript for UI and test suite Repository: /ungoogled-software/ungoogled-chromium the ungoogled-software group and its contributors.Unlike many Chromium-based browsers, ungoogled-chromium does not attempt to deviate away from Chromium, having been described by its developers as a "drop-in replacement for Chromium". The developers behind the project describe it as "Google Chromium, sans (without) dependency on Google web services". Ungoogled-chromium is a free and open-source Chromium-based web browser with the aim of increasing privacy through removing Google components and blobs. Market share, unsurprisingly, continues to grow along with everything else.Other articles that mention 'Ungoogled-chromium' On the other hand, Raspberry Pi products started as super affordable development machines and the market has expanded both upscale and downscale since then. In particular, there are no planned entry-level systems based on Power10 or System-Z that would allow small companies and developers to start with IBM and grow. In my opinion, the clueless disconnect on how to grow market share and why that's important continues. What used to be known as big blue is now smurf sized. What I find remarkable is, that even after a string of CEOs clueless about technology and what it takes to thrive in the computer industry, that IBM is still around and still shrinking. It means there will be a even bigger RP2040 ecosystem than even the RPT can create on its own.) (And this is why I think the RPT is being incredibly clever by selling RP2040 chips to all and sundry. Sometimes, wanting *all* the profit from your innovative work can mean that the total is zero. ISA/EISA was open, so all the add-in card manufacturers kept using it and the non-IBM manufacturers-everyone from m/b to full systems-stuck with ISA. The problem was that IBM kept it as a closed system (exactly what Apple did that came close to sinking them, too). MCA was actually a big technological improvement. ![]() Mon 4:46 pmIBM also stumbled with the hardware at that time and introduced micro channel, which was less compatible than the clones and effectively reset their market share to zero. While it's nice to hack Chromium so it makes good use of special Raspberry Pi APIs, it would be better to hack the Pi so standard APIs used by all browsers ran well. IBM also stumbled with the hardware at that time and introduced micro channel, which was less compatible than the clones and effectively reset their market share to zero.Īs far a Chrome and Chromium goes, it's got a market share advantage at the moment, however, the situation is a bit worse on the Pi due to it being the only officially supported browser. In my opinion the reason it wasn't successful is that it was not cheap. My recollection is OS/2 was also written by Microsoft originally as a joint project with IBM. It seems we are now in much the same position, with Google playing the part of MS.ġ) If I want Windows (or Google or whatever), I know where to find it.Ģ) When given the choice between a real X and something else emulating X, people will always go for the real X. Largely because MS was always able to put secret, hidden things in Windows that only worked under genuine Windows. The point being that, although on paper they (OS/2) were there (i.e, in theory at least, it did Windows as well as MS did), it never quite worked out in practice (and, believe me, I tried). This idea that the Rpi is a "desktop replacement" strikes me as being very similar to when OS/2 was trying to be as good (or better than) MS at doing Windows.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |